Re:Postgres sequences can skip 32 unexpectedly
by tonyarkles on Friday July 16, 2021 @04:23PM
(#27860808)
Depending, very much, on that balance between usability and security. For the use case in the story, I'd way rather talk about (and write down) incidents 122 through 124 with my team, rather than incidents 549697a9-dd6a-4a90-a5f4-b2ff1a1d9289, d6150929-a692-414b-ba9e-ccbcf5e48a59, and 2756998d-035f-42bc-a97d-4135529e85d9.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.