Re:How many real numbers exist? New proof moves closer to an...
by btilly on Friday July 16, 2021 @02:19PM
(#27859404)
Your "easily shown" is only easily shown if you're sloppy.
If you're careful, it can't be shown at all.
As I already pointed out, if classical mathematics is consistent, then constructivism must be as well. Therefore if you think that you've found a logical flaw in constructivism, the mistake must be in your own thinking.
If you're careful, it can't be shown at all.
As I already pointed out, if classical mathematics is consistent, then constructivism must be as well. Therefore if you think that you've found a logical flaw in constructivism, the mistake must be in your own thinking.