News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by Hizonner on Friday July 16, 2021 @01:44PM (#27858955)
Why does any one thing have to be a "standard"? That's part of the problem.
Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by JumpCrisscross on Friday July 16, 2021 @02:27PM (#27859504)
> Why does any one thing have to be a "standard"? That's part of the problem.

Economies of scale and network effects.

Nothing has to be the standard. But if 80% of people are familiar with X, choosing Y incurs friction.

Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by lazyjones on Friday July 16, 2021 @03:27PM (#27860213)
What has to be "standard"? The application itself or its UX? I'm pretty sure it's the latter, so all it takes is a familiar UI and low-friction approach. You don't have to be a world famous brand for people to be able to use it.
Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by dimitrios1 on Friday July 16, 2021 @01:59PM (#27859140)
Exactly. We only need a "standard" because everyone builds walled gardens and easy content distribution to multiple platforms is intentionally difficult. Right now you have to watch a "YouTube" video, instead of just a video on YouTube.
Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by semitones on Friday July 16, 2021 @02:10PM (#27859272)
Standards != centralization. Standards apply more to protocols, and centralization applies more to ownership of data.

For instance, there is an enormous benefit to the entire world from using a standard IP/TCP stack. Yet, we don't seem to suffer from a centralized authority making controversial or conflict-of-interest decisions regarding that stack.

So what I was suggesting is that document-editing abide by some global protocol/standard, which would include storage, versioning, and permissions. As far as the choice of user-facing interfaces and implementations of logic around those standards, there need not be just one, or even a few. Everyone can bring something cool to the table and anyone can use whichever flavor they wish.

Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by kdmdmsl on Friday July 16, 2021 @02:31PM (#27859550)
To avoid Google Drive/Docs/etc you don't have to boil the ocean. Buy a Synology DiskStation and just use the included software

It's a solution that works for anyone with basic IT skills. Offer your extended family access, and use the provided software to control permissions etc

Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by semitones on Friday July 16, 2021 @02:17PM (#27859373)
Also, non-powerusers will gravitate towards the simplest solution to their problem, and that will also tend to be the one that the highest number of people understand how to use.
Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by dudus on Friday July 16, 2021 @01:57PM (#27859119)
Exactly, if we replace one standard for another what problem are we solving if the main goal was to reduce centralization.
Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by jchrisa on Friday July 16, 2021 @02:11PM (#27859295)
In the pandemic my elementary aged kids become Google Docs experts. Network effects are real.
Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by judge2020 on Friday July 16, 2021 @01:58PM (#27859127)
If nobody uses something, what difference does it make?
Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content” by j4yav on Friday July 16, 2021 @02:06PM (#27859231)
Everyone uses it or nobody uses it aren’t the only two options.