Companies are empires, and empires don't change because an underling thinks they should.

Empires change because they're overrun from outside, or - vanishingly rarely, on moral issues - because the emperor decrees it and/or is replaced.

Amazon may go in a different direction with Bezos gone. It almost certainly won't, but there's always a tiny sliver of potential when the big jobs change.

The political opinions of an Ln are irrelevant. Not even L10s get to set moral policy.

Companies act on the will of shareholders.

So what is about Oracle's shareholders that make it, or any company, more or less ethical, or in Oracle's case, litigious?