Re:Like your hair is on fire
by shafqat on Sunday August 17, 2008 @12:56PM
(#278444)
I like this... we chose to go against standard advice and will be officially launching to the public on Tuesday. Our sneak preview has been up for a while but I really hope there will people around to spread the word!
Re:Like your hair is on fire
by shafqat on Sunday August 17, 2008 @05:05PM
(#278602)
You're probably right. But at the same time, we don't want to create 'artificial' events... Let's see how things go with the official launch. Fingers crossed. Either way, its been a great ride so far!
Re:Like your hair is on fire
by vnorby on Sunday August 17, 2008 @03:15PM
(#278518)
I would hope not. Since hair grows at a speed of 1/2 inch/month and burns at a speed of 1/2 inch/minute, you'd either need to start out with a lot of hair, or risk spending most of your time applying a flame to fledgling hair sprouts around your body. Or dispensing Rogain furiously. Both which would waste time.
Re:Like your hair is on fire
by Alex3917 on Sunday August 17, 2008 @06:25PM
(#278657)
Seth might have only had 205 words worth of stuff to say, but then again he only used 205 words to say it. There might have been a more insightful paragraph written somewhere else on the Internet today, no doubt buried in the middle of some four page article. But pound for pound it's hard to come away from Seth's blog feeling like you haven't gotten your money's worth. That's what makes him the best in the world at what he does, and that's what makes it worth voting up.
Actually, anyone have scientific explanations for burning hair?
You just have to add a little of a flammable substance to it. I'd suggest ethanol or gasoline.
The "Just do it" them has been oft-used on HN. In that sense, the theme of the article was a re-run. (although perhaps a needed re-run?)
I just didn't get so much from the article. Glad you liked it. I'll keep my eye out for future Seth goodness.
I am getting a little tired of the same dozen commentators on HN. I was hoping we'd be a little more widely read than that.