Re:FBI arrests 16 in Anonymous hacking investigation
by redthrowaway on Tuesday July 19, 2011 @09:38PM
(#2783926)
How exactly does running LOIC constitute "conspiring to intentionally damage protected computers?" Where's the damage? Does standing in front of a vending machine now qualify as vandalism?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FBI arrests 16 in Anonymous hacking investigation
by GHFigs on Tuesday July 19, 2011 @10:58PM
(#2784124)
(8) the term “damage” means any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information;
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_0...
Re:FBI arrests 16 in Anonymous hacking investigation
by lucasjung on Tuesday July 19, 2011 @10:12PM
(#2784007)
IANAL, but I would guess that the actual text of the statute in question extends beyond things that you or I would normally consider "damage." The names given to legal codes are necessarily concise, and therefore sometimes don't fully describe the contents of the code in question.