News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:$100M xPrize for Carbon Removal by burgessaccount on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @08:32PM (#27827997)
Definitely true! I am a huge fan of trees. But the wrong tree in the wrong place is a bad thing. I try to advocate for responsible and thoughtful reforestation - which is, unfortunately, a lot more expensive than people want it to be.
Re:$100M xPrize for Carbon Removal by jbay808 on Wednesday July 14, 2021 @01:03AM (#27829888)
Where can I learn more about the costs and challenges of thoughtful reforestation, and the key differences between the responsible and irresponsible sort? (Just popping in to ask because it seems like you might know). I'm interested in doing some work in this space but don't have any background.
Re:$100M xPrize for Carbon Removal by burgessaccount on Wednesday July 14, 2021 @09:00AM (#27832523)
Hmm… can’t point to one specific book, but there are lots of links. You can google “reforestation monoculture” and “reforestation native species.” This article is a great place to start: https://e360.yale.edu/features/why-green-pledges-will-not-cr... It doesn’t get into the granularity of the costs, but highlights that the basic issue is countries are still hoping to make a profit off these “carbon sinks” by planting easily usable timber - aka monoculture - which greatly diminishes the benefits of forests and leaves them vulnerable to blights and other disasters.
Re:$100M xPrize for Carbon Removal by jbay808 on Wednesday July 14, 2021 @04:34PM (#27838088)
Thank you very much!