News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Firefox 90 by aembleton on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @06:59PM (#27827266)
> In our dashboards, Firefox does not even exist.

Where are your dashboards getting the data from?

I use Firefox, but like many Firefox users I use uBlockOrigin so I block requests to trackers like Google Analytics and StatCounter.

Re:Firefox 90 by sharps1 on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @09:05PM (#27828290)
Less than 40% use extensions. Of the most popular - uBO is less than 5%, so most people likely aren’t blocking it unless it’s the default.

https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/usage-behavior

Re:Firefox 90 by asoneth on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @08:42PM (#27828092)
That may be true that dashboards are under-counting Firefox, but the ultimate impact is the same. Without some kind of evidence that more than a trivial number of hits come from Firefox why would any small business pour time into catering to an audience that might exist instead of pursuing one that does?
Re:Firefox 90 by ric2b on Monday July 19, 2021 @09:28AM (#27882411)
Firefox sends an easily identifiable user-agent string with every request.

If businesses want to operate on bad data (analytics that depend on JS), that's their fault.

Re:Firefox 90 by fleddr on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @07:14PM (#27827381)
From Adobe analytics and sometimes Google analytics.

You're right that ad blockers are on the rise, but that's also true for Chrome.

Note that the points I made regarding market share seem to be consistent across the board. Whether you check Statcounter, an alternative to that, or the analytics of large websites. The story is the same: Firefox is tiny, lost in a see of dozens of equally tiny browsers.

Re:Firefox 90 by remram on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @08:03PM (#27827726)
Firefox users are running uBlock and Badger on mobile too