Who said bitcoin is currency? It doesn't even meeting definitional requirements for currency. Moreover, if bitcoin and its crypto advocates were just OK with letting it run side by side with fiat currencies that'd be one thing. But the perhaps not express still implicit goal of crypto is to replace fiat currency which necessarily puts it into conflict with the Gov. whether in the east or west. There's an anarchist theme there. So how can it really be surprising there's push back? Let's not forget spending fiat currency --- well, at least in the west (the good side) --- has no overlord limits other than criminal you think exist.
The key quote is here: https://ibb.co/Sm8LW0x
Asked and answered + 1.
Also crypto has no utility and should be banned.
I also hate those cancel culture people who are like 'it doesn't provide utility in my narrow minded view on how the world should be, so it should be banned'. If you don't like or understand something, breath and move on with your life. Keep it to yourself and let others live in peace.
If you really want to go down the rabbit hole of removing stuff that's not 'necessary' to 'save the planet', ok, lets ban air conditioning. You don't NEED it. How about we stop the mass castration of animals and all the unnecessary spending on them and ban pets. Oh they have use and meaning to you? well not to me, ban them.