News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scenarios in which Tesla FSD Beta 9.0 fails by AtlasBarfed on Monday July 12, 2021 @03:35PM (#27814090)
Humans have an ... ok ... driving algorithm for unfamiliar roads. It's improved a lot with maps/directions software, but it still sucks, especially the more dense you get.

Routes people drive frequently are much more optimized: knowledge of specific road conditions like potholes, undulations, sight lines, etc.

I would like to have centrally curated AI programs for routes rather than a solve-everything adhoc program like Tesla is doing.

However, the adhoc/memoryless model will still work ok on highway miles I would guess.

What I really want is extremely safe highway driving more than automated a trip to Taco Bell.

I personally think Tesla is doing ...ok. The beta 9 is marginally better than the beta 8 from the youtubes I've seen. Neither are ready for primetime, but both are impressive technical demonstrations.

If they did a full-from-scratch about three or four years ago then this is frankly pretty amazing.

Of course with Tesla you have the fanboys (he is the technogod of the future!) and the rabid haters (someone equated him with Donald Trump, please).

A basic uncertainty lookup map would probably be a good thing. How many tesla drivers took control in this area/section? What is the reported certainties by the software for this area/section?

It's all a black box, google's geofencing, Tesla, once-upon-a-time Uber, GM supercruise, etc.

A twitter account listing failures is meaningless without the grand scheme of statistics and success rates. A Twitter account of human failures would be even scarier.

There are no comments on this comment yet.