How many wars could have been prevented if governments couldn’t have printed way more money than they had GDP for and then needed to start a war to try and “fix” it? This is the hyperobject we could be on the cusp of here.
Probably none.
Countries have had hyperinflation and then had wars, but I've never heard of a case where the hyperinflation caused the war. They're always linked by the same common cause: some shock (government collapse, market collapse, another war) that caused a supply shortage. That messed with the whole economy until it eventually resulted in violence.
Hyperinflation is a response to economic collapse, not the cause of it. Or you could see it as a measure of economic collapse; again, the metric reflects the problem, but isn't the problem itself.
The big, looming crypto question remains: if this stuff is so revolutionary, why doesn’t someone go and do something revolutionary with it?