Re:Solar is dirt-cheap and about to get even more powerful
by dd36 on Saturday July 10, 2021 @11:30PM
(#27798267)
But still cheaper than supporting the utility’s transmission and distribution infrastructure with $150/kWh storage.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Solar is dirt-cheap and about to get even more powerful
by TedDoesntTalk on Sunday July 11, 2021 @12:16AM
(#27798426)
I don’t understand. How is paying $10,000 or more cheaper than using the electricity provided by my local electric company? The break even point is probably 5 years if you really can install everything but $10,000.
The opportunity cost of that $10,000 is, let’s say 5% per year on avg, or $2500 over 5 years (without compounding which would skew this even further against panels)
Re:Solar is dirt-cheap and about to get even more powerful
by dd36 on Sunday July 11, 2021 @09:14AM
(#27800520)
The solar system should last 25 years. That’s about 2c/kWh.
With your electric utility, after all the additional fees, you’re probably at at least 15c/kWh.
Storage simply needs to cost less than 13c/kWh to make economic sense.
Re:Solar is dirt-cheap and about to get even more powerful
by dd36 on Sunday July 11, 2021 @09:10PM
(#27805897)
Also, 2c/kWh is a hedge against inflation. Utility prices go up not down.
Re:Solar is dirt-cheap and about to get even more powerful
by 1123581321 on Sunday July 11, 2021 @12:45AM
(#27798525)
Right, it just depends on the numbers. Taxes and credits have a lot to do with it. For example, a $10k (after credits) system might save at averaged $1200/year accounting for production lost, increasing a bit over time due to utility hikes. After 20 years, assuming the system is now worthless, that will compare similarly to an 8% stock market return plus initial capital after capital gains taxes. The solar system would return in a narrower range of performance than the stock market return.