Re:“One Day Longer and Those 13 Boys Would Be Dead”
by fastasucan on Saturday July 10, 2021 @06:13PM
(#27796847)
How do you know that this wasn't the easiest/only option? (Since you said it was the hardest).
Re:“One Day Longer and Those 13 Boys Would Be Dead”
by janci on Sunday July 11, 2021 @06:17AM
(#27799721)
From the article:
>Later, after the water had run off, you could see that down at the bottom, where the boys walked in, there were much larger gaps. But the divers couldn’t attach anything to the muddy bottom when laying out the guide lines. They had to follow along the ceiling. The only path they found was through the narrow passageways.
As I understand it, they had to use the narrow passages at the top because they were not able to discover the wide gaps near the bottom. I assume some equipment could help with that making the transport easier once a more comfortable path was found.
Re:“One Day Longer and Those 13 Boys Would Be Dead”
by watwut on Sunday July 11, 2021 @07:49AM
(#27800080)
> I assume some equipment could help with that making the transport easier once a more comfortable path was found.
Or maybe your assumptions are wrong.
> What are you even basing this statement on?
As I understand it, the transport was immensely difficult. The divers and the rescued kids were at great danger. It is unbelievable to me they managed to save them without any special solution.
I'm sorry if my comment was misunderstood.