It's apples to oranges in any case. Comparing revenues of an OEM, to a fabful CPU manufacturer, to a foundry is just weird and makes little sense. I don't know what point you were trying to make.
https://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/about-us/business-over...
It doesn't address the key issue that I brought up which is that comparing operating profits of radically different company/conglomerates doesn't make any sense, while (whether it's called SLSI or SamsungSemi, a name I've never heard used in Gumi/Suwan) comparing a subset of SEC (a name which internally only refers to the OEM side) would at least be comparing honeycrisp to grannysmith.
SLSI is the internal acronym used to discuss the whole of Samsung Semi whether for historical or political reasons. Certainly, a quick search shows other news sources get this correct. I don't think that naming is really so complicated or controversial to those in the industry.
https://www.phonearena.com/news/google-pixel-6-and-pixel-6-p...
I haven't been to Korea for 18 months, but I've traded those same business cards since 2002. Your confidence seems misplaced.
SLSI is an operating division within Samsung Electronics. There are certain Samsung chaebol companies in the electronics industry that are not operating divisions of SEC - eg SEMCO and SDI - but SDC and SLSI most certainly are.
In addition, Samsung RAM and NAND Flash operations do not fall within SLSI. Both the memory division and SLSI fall under the semiconductor division of the device solutions division (which also includes SDC).
Hard to imagine how you can write such a smug comment while being completely wrong, but I guess that’s HN for you.