Re:How The Chronicle is trying to malign Sci-Hub
by Jolter on Friday July 09, 2021 @10:03AM
(#27783765)
Nope. Peer review is a kind of quality filter (in theory but seldom in practice), but that does nothing to solve the question of “is this a paper worthy of publishing”. That question gets resolved by the publisher/editor of the journal long before the paper makes it to peer review.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How The Chronicle is trying to malign Sci-Hub
by FabHK on Friday July 09, 2021 @11:22AM
(#27784618)
And the editors are (like the reviewers) a bunch of scientists paid by their respective institutions, aren't they? So, what does the publisher do?