Senior Google exec opposes remote work, moves to New Zealand to work remotely

Re:Senior Google exec opposes remote work, moves to New Zeal... by mertd on Thursday July 08, 2021 @08:03PM (#27779078)

Think of human labor as a natural resource. If the employer is overseas, you're selling the raw resource. You'd rather make some goods out of the resource and sell that instead.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Senior Google exec opposes remote work, moves to New Zeal... by twojacobtwo on Thursday July 08, 2021 @08:29PM (#27779286)

To me, that just means that an equivalent local worker is worth more than the remote worker, but the remote worker would still be a net inflow regardless, as the parent comment said.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Senior Google exec opposes remote work, moves to New Zeal... by PostOnce on Thursday July 08, 2021 @08:20PM (#27779202)

It's not as though most countries have a local Google / Facebook / etc clone, so they can't "make the goods" domestically, there's no "means of production" in-country.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Senior Google exec opposes remote work, moves to New Zeal... by austhrow743 on Friday July 09, 2021 @02:17AM (#27780932)

You as the country the prospective remote worker could be visiting aren't the owner of the human labor though. The human labor and employer are both overseas and you have the option of getting one to visit you and spend their money in your land.

Everything about the scenario exactly mirrors tourism as far as I can see, and countries generally like rich tourists visiting.

[ Parent | on HN ]