Outside of a small vocal group of people mostly concentrated on HN and prone to give crappy hot takes, practically everyone in the world "accepts Electrons".

And usually there is no better solution because third party integrations to online services (think Stack, Discord, etc.) are limited or aren’t kept up-to-date with official apps.

Or, in Discord’s case, are outright against the ToS and not worth people’s bother.

The market is people that have a lot of meetings and invest a lot of time in preparing/documenting them.

By the way, you are talking as if the set of people who accept electron apps and pay for expensive apps is a fixed one. It's a tradeoff. It the app is good enough, people won't care that it's Electron or that it's expensive (and, for the record, few people care about Electron apps).

> The idea of "value proposition" is so absolutely inane.

The value proposition of something is not the price, but what it gives to the user.

> you would be spending as much on your tools as to what they bring.

The value you offer is the value offered by your tools plus the value you add by working with them.

I'm making a bit of a joke here, but the market is plenty huge for this app. Also, not all of Hackernews is developers who have opinions on electron. e.g. Me.