“Plug and socket”, industry group pushes for "obvious" change in terminology

Re:“Plug and socket”, industry group pushes for "obvious" ch... by Cthulhu_ on Thursday July 08, 2021 @08:10AM (#27770893)

Who is outraged and who is bullying in this case? It looks like the industry is being proactive and is pre-empting outrage. Using gendered terminology is unnecessary anyway, to the point where it becomes childish (giggle, boy plug goes into girl socket and you get sparks)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“Plug and socket”, industry group pushes for "obvious" ch... by lotsofpulp on Thursday July 08, 2021 @08:18AM (#27770961)

Male/female terminology cuts through noise and using male/female for plugs translates to probably every language immediately if you are trying to convey what plugs into what.

I can see a possibility that it had real utility in communicating concepts across completely, different languages, where using the words socket and plug might have caused confusion and more time spent in translation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“Plug and socket”, industry group pushes for "obvious" ch... by senortumnus on Thursday July 08, 2021 @08:25AM (#27771026)

Agreed - it’s intuitive to humans, the primary users of tech

Plug and socket: less intuitive

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“Plug and socket”, industry group pushes for "obvious" ch... by raxxorrax on Thursday July 08, 2021 @08:25AM (#27771017)

Using gendered terminology is probably not harmful at all. Why should it be? This terminology was understood in almost all colleagues in nearly any languages. Most were men, yes, but that isn't the reason why women are underrepresentated.

[ Parent | on HN ]