Re:More than 30 states sue Google over 'extravagant' fees in...
by lostmsu on Thursday July 08, 2021 @07:30AM
(#27770599)
Unless you can show such a policy, it is reasonable to assume it does not exist. I surely have no way to prove otherwise short of finding complete list of all policies. A good indication is that neither of us heard about it so far.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:More than 30 states sue Google over 'extravagant' fees in...
by simondotau on Thursday July 08, 2021 @09:50AM
(#27771913)
If we have no evidence, it is not "reasonable to assume" anything.
Meanwhile, I'm merely saying that it wouldn't surprise me if such a policy exists, whether formally or informally. The distinct lack of any product on Walmart shelves which has a below-RRP price printed on its packaging is strong circumstantial evidence at the very least.
Re:More than 30 states sue Google over 'extravagant' fees in...
by lostmsu on Thursday July 08, 2021 @12:51PM
(#27774628)
It is reasonable due to the Occam Razor.
The fact that you mentioned is an extremely weak evidence in the light of very thin margins Walmart has (under 3%), which is more than 10 times less than the old store tax, with probably even smaller incentive to combat.