Additionally, the atmosphere blocks a bunch of wavelengths that are really interesting to observe [1] so we still want to be in space for these observations.
Finally, in the non distant future I believe space telescopes will ditch mirrors altogether. For instance, the proposed Aragoscope [2] would use diffraction optics instead of so called geometric optics (lenses, mirrors) to focus light. Since the material that can provide the diffraction can be anything it would be much cheaper to launch a sheet of <insert light and bendy material here> that can unfold once in space instead of incredibly precise and fragile mirrors. Also, according to Nasa, this approach can achieve ~1000 time the resolution of HST at a fraction of the price and we are only limited by the size of the disk creating the diffraction.
[1] https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-atmospheric-transmis... .
[2] https://www.nasa.gov/content/the-aragoscope-ultra-high-resol... .
Also I don't know if there actual benefits in doing mirror construction in low gravity
It is not only fairing size that is limiting