News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An Exxon lobbyist thought he was in a job interview. Inst... by scoopertrooper on Tuesday July 06, 2021 @01:03PM (#27751286)
Keen to hear how you've solved the journalism revenue problem. You must surely be a billionaire!
Re:An Exxon lobbyist thought he was in a job interview. Inst... by skinkestek on Tuesday July 06, 2021 @01:14PM (#27751460)
Following my recommendation won't make anyone a billionaire I think but it will give them a chance at some of my leftover money:

allow me to buy one issue, or one story or 50 tokens or something.

But between two papers, one national broadcaster that costs me n x $100, Netflix, Spotify, supporting Amnesty and Médecins Sans Frontières, my family and my church there isn't room for everyone who want me to subscribe.

Re:An Exxon lobbyist thought he was in a job interview. Inst... by tablespoon on Tuesday July 06, 2021 @04:16PM (#27753683)
> allow me to buy one issue, or one story or 50 tokens or something.

The problem with that idea is:

1) it doesn't result in a predictable revenue stream (required for good investigative journalism), and...

2) it incentives click-bait and outrage-bait more than anything else.

Re:An Exxon lobbyist thought he was in a job interview. Inst... by skinkestek on Wednesday July 07, 2021 @07:18AM (#27759729)
> it incentives click-bait and outrage-bait more than anything else.

Yes. And as I wrote above I don't expect anyone to get rich from it if done according to how I thought it would work.

As for avoiding click bait, what blendle did was to offer refunds. I think they later reversed that policy, and I think that was the point I gave them up (also Linux magazines and other stuff I wanted to read never showed up).

Still, for someone wanting to be running a decent company, not a unicorn factory I think there is a niche:

I actively read very much, even from journalists I deeply disagree with, and I'd rather spend $2 extra a day on good writing than coffe (for instance).