News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Console Do Not Track – Proposal for a standard environmen... by kazinator on Tuesday July 06, 2021 @12:53PM (#27751147)
If the variable is widely implemented, then that provides the nice, single point of control that the users need.

In the FOSS world, we typically have distros between the applications and the users. If the applications honor the variable, then that's all the control that is required. A distro can implement an opt-in model by defining the variable with a value of 1 in the base system, so that it's present right from boot.

Re:Console Do Not Track – Proposal for a standard environmen... by TeMPOraL on Tuesday July 06, 2021 @02:45PM (#27752684)
It's not a big enough of a change for people to actually choose Linux distributions over it - those who know about the variable will set it themselves, those who don't will be stuck with a bad default.

My issue isn't with the point of control - it's with the default. Telemetry of all kinds should be opt-in. People shouldn't have to worry that they're constantly being watched. They shouldn't have to hope that every single telemetry stream is operated by competent and careful software engineers, guided by honest and law-abiding managers. You know how this industry works; it's a rare case where a data collection scheme doesn't overreach, accidentally ingest too much, leak data, or turn malicious and pass it to bad actors.