Re:Console Do Not Track – Proposal for a standard environmen...
by jeofken on Tuesday July 06, 2021 @11:00AM
(#27749518)
The similie fails since software tracking in programs you run are agreed to by you when you accepted the license agreement.
Yet another reason to prefer free as in freedom software, which can be forked.
Re:Console Do Not Track – Proposal for a standard environmen...
by LocalH on Tuesday July 06, 2021 @03:10PM
(#27752992)
I don’t think the simile fails for that reason. “Informed consent” is generally accepted as the standard, and it’s arguable that click-through EULAs are not in any way “informed consent” for the average person.
To bring the original simile full circle, let’s say a person signs a contract with another person, and then that person forces themselves on them. I doubt the presence of a clause in the contract saying “I agree to have sex with X” would absolve them of guilt.
Re:Console Do Not Track – Proposal for a standard environmen...
by jeofken on Thursday July 08, 2021 @09:18AM
(#27771565)
There certainly is a difference in harm between forcing sex and sending unique user IDs, and it’s not unreasonable to make a contract about the latter if one wishes, is it?
This is rather a reason to prefer free software licenses. Culture has yet to catch up to this, but in the long run I hope the collective consciousness learns to distrust and avoid complicated proprietary software licences.
Having good intents does not justify skipping consent. The “opt-out” mentality is a very slippery slope, since you’re already stating that consent does not need to be explicit (hint: it’s not consent if not given explicitly AND freely).