> that’s the person who uploaded the code’s infringement rather than GitHub’s
That's not how it works. Anyone and everyone who distributes it is infringing and carries risk of enforcement action. That could also be someone further downstream.
> Furthermore, as described in the article, the legal precedent has been that you don’t actually need copyright to something to train a model on it.
I'm not commenting on this aspect.
Re:GitHub Copilot is not infringing copyright
by 542458 on Monday July 05, 2021 @08:26PM
(#27743124)
That is absolutely how it works.
https://www.eff.org/issues/dmca
“The DMCA “safe harbors” protect service providers from monetary liability based on the allegedly infringing activities of third parties.”
Furthermore, as described in the article, the legal precedent has been that you don’t actually need copyright to something to train a model on it. You may think that’s silly or inconsistent, but that’s how the legal precedent is.