News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Media blackout after key witness against Assange admits l... by mikem170 on Saturday July 03, 2021 @10:17PM (#27726795)
I believe it. I just don't see the big deal, given the fact that Clinton and the DNC were exposed trying to steal an election. That's why this happened. Assange and the Russians didn't screw Bernie Sanders. Truth is truth, right?
Re:Media blackout after key witness against Assange admits l... by UncleMeat on Sunday July 04, 2021 @09:08AM (#27729352)
Truth or not, it is evidence that WikiLeaks was motivated by something other than pure transparency.
Re:Media blackout after key witness against Assange admits l... by deviledeggs on Saturday July 03, 2021 @11:16PM (#27726975)
The delegates were exposed as disliking Bernie Sanders. That's it. There's nothing illegal or immoral about that, which is why there were no criminal charges or lawsuits even after Republicans won the election and both houses of Congress.

It was a smear campaign targeted at democrats, nothing more.

This is textbook whataboutism. "Stealing a hundred thousand confidential emails from political rivals is fine because look at all the bad things they said about Bernie Sanders"

Look at the even more outrageous event of Trump magically getting the laptop of his rival's son and parading it around in 2020. It's organized crime trying to corrupt politics that you're rooting for. The kind of thing that happens in Russia or deeply corrupt banana republics

Re:Media blackout after key witness against Assange admits l... by mikem170 on Monday July 05, 2021 @06:15PM (#27742307)
I don't think it's whataboutism. We were discussing if exposed corruption should be dismissed as being partisan.

There was more than just a DNC dislike of Bernie Sanders. There were financial, policy, and hiring decisions involved, arranged between Clinton and the DNC, contrary to a free and fair election. From wikipedia [0]:

> The leaks resulted in allegations of bias against Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign, in apparent contradiction with the DNC leadership's publicly stated neutrality, as several DNC operatives seemed to deride Sanders' campaign and discussed ways to advance Hillary Clinton's nomination. Later reveals included controversial DNC–Clinton agreements dated before the primary, regarding financial arrangements and control over policy and hiring decisions. The revelations prompted the resignation of DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz before the 2016 Democratic National Convention. The DNC issued a formal apology to Bernie Sanders and his supporters "for the inexcusable remarks made over email" that did not reflect the DNC's "steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process." After the convention, DNC CEO Amy Dacey, CFO Brad Marshall, and Communications Director Luis Miranda also resigned in the wake of the controversy.

I'm rooting for the exposure of political corruption on all sides. I think it is an important thing for the people to know the truth, no matter the messenger.

Are you rooting for something different?

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Democratic_National_Commi...