Re:HHS announces rule to protect consumers from surprise med...
by mikepurvis on Friday July 02, 2021 @04:18PM
(#27716360)
In 99% of cases, you don't need or want cutting edge care— you need basic, efficient, timely care. The rest of the world manages to deliver that as a basic human right.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:HHS announces rule to protect consumers from surprise med...
by brutus1213 on Friday July 02, 2021 @06:47PM
(#27717831)
Yes .. but. Canada is often pointed at by Americans as an example of a functioning healthcare system. I can tell you we have many problems, but they are different. It might mean long queues for basic diagnostics/assessments/procedures, facilities that look ugly, excessive waits in the ER, and still paying an arm and a leg for medication. I have heard of great experiences in Canada but also pretty terrible ones.
Re:HHS announces rule to protect consumers from surprise med...
by mikepurvis on Friday July 02, 2021 @11:47PM
(#27719201)
I'm a Canadian too. Maybe I've just been lucky, but when I or anyone in my family has needed urgent care, I've never felt like I had to wait excessive amounts of time for it.
As far as whether facilities could be "nicer", I mean... maybe? I actually kind of prefer healthcare to be like schools in this way— if I don't think it's nice enough for me, then I need to lobby the province to collect more taxes and make it nicer for everyone rather than just taking my dollars elsewhere.
And that doesn't even address the whole billing-surprise angle. I would happily wait forever if the alternative was not knowing if I was going to randomly be stuck with a $10M bill.
Re:HHS announces rule to protect consumers from surprise med...
by dragonwriter on Friday July 02, 2021 @06:50PM
(#27717847)
> Canada is often pointed at by Americans as an example of a functioning healthcare system.
To be fair, Americans have a very low standard for “functioning healthcare system” due to the American healthcare system.