FCC reaffirms $3M fine for marketing unauthorized drone transmitters

Re:FCC reaffirms $3M fine for marketing unauthorized drone t... by oceanghost on Friday July 02, 2021 @02:23AM (#27708358)

You just jogged a weird memory out of my head. In the early days of the internet there were sites that had pirate audio streams from analog cell phones. It was pretty sporadic but a very interesting sort of slice of life thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FCC reaffirms $3M fine for marketing unauthorized drone t... by serf on Friday July 02, 2021 @03:20AM (#27708701)

I used to watch analog TV streams that were being reroadcast on the ShoutCast network years and years ago.

It's a strange thing to see white-snow-static redigitized and then drop bit-rates.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FCC reaffirms $3M fine for marketing unauthorized drone t... by function_seven on Friday July 02, 2021 @04:06AM (#27708987)

> It's a strange thing to see white-snow-static redigitized and then drop bit-rates.

Old-school white snow static is theoretically the most uncompressable thing, right? So some poor encoder is being told to "send this at 384kb!" and it just throws its little robot hands up and says, "fine, here's your super blocky bullshit. I'm going on break..."

Or something like that?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FCC reaffirms $3M fine for marketing unauthorized drone t... by zaarn on Friday July 02, 2021 @06:55AM (#27709958)

Modern codecs detect noise, filter it out and add back artifical noise at the decoder (especially audio codecs can do this with all kinds of noise). I think back in the day, video compression would likely not have an issue as noise is high frequency and if you're compressing images, that's the first thing to go, you'd just get a blurrier image.

[ Parent | on HN ]