> When it works most of the time, it lulls you into a false sense of security, and then when it fails, you aren't prepared and you die.

That still doesn't _necessarily_ imply that 'partially self-driving cars' are worse than actually existing humans. Really, anything that's (statistically) better than humans is better, right?

I don't think it's reasonable to think that even 'perfect' self-driving cars would result in literally zero accidents (or even fatalities).