Re:Why There Will Never be Another Da Vinci
by bluekeybox on Saturday July 16, 2011 @02:53PM
(#2771397)
Similarly, Max Planck's academic advisor said to the young would-be physicist that going into physics is a bad idea because all of the big discoveries had been already made and that physics had become a science concerned mostly with details.
Considering the direction physics took in the 20th century and the direct impact Max Planck's work had on it taking that direction, this anecdote, if it is accurate, is just mind-boggling.
Re:Why There Will Never be Another Da Vinci
by jballanc on Saturday July 16, 2011 @01:44PM
(#2771200)
Had she only lived a bit longer...
Re:Why There Will Never be Another Da Vinci
by freddealmeida on Saturday July 16, 2011 @04:44AM
(#2770423)
well said. The limits of science are not bound to our own.
Really...if you don't know Crick's story, go read up! In his lifetime, man went from not even being sure what category of chemical was responsible for inheritance to sequencing the full human genome, and Crick was there for a number of very important steps. Oh, and did I mention that he was originally trained as a physicist? and that in his final years he was deeply involved in neuroscience research concerned with the nature of consciousness?
For anyone who is really concerned with knowledge and its limits, I would also recommend the book "Impossibility: The Limits of Science and the Science of Limits". Don't waste your time with this sort of pop science drivel...