Re:Python for C++ and Java programmers
by spacemanaki on Friday July 15, 2011 @08:50PM
(#2769739)
Should this be labeled (2003)? What's changed since then, any of this that should be revised for whatever's considered the current "stable" Python?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
It should have been. Still it's the best learning source I've seen, especially when combined with docs.python.org, particularly the tutorial, what's new, and brief tour of the standard library