News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A foreign seller has hijacked my Amazon Klein bottle listing by heavyset_go on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @07:05PM (#27694572)
Companies are taking a broad interpretation of Section 230 and claim that the law shields tech companies from all liability for their platform[1], online and off, and not just liability for hosting user created content.

Lower level courts seem to agree with them, although one such case has been fought all the way to the Supreme Court[2].

[1] https://www.lawfareblog.com/herrick-v-grindr-why-section-230...

[2] https://www.americanbar.org/groups/diversity/women/publicati...

Re:A foreign seller has hijacked my Amazon Klein bottle listing by jhgb on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @10:22PM (#27695703)
So just having a web shop shields you for example from the consequences of selling counterfeit goods? How does that work?
Re:A foreign seller has hijacked my Amazon Klein bottle listing by heavyset_go on Thursday July 01, 2021 @07:48PM (#27706314)
They'll argue that they aren't liable for the crimes that users of their platform commit using their platform and cite Section 230 of the CDA.
Re:A foreign seller has hijacked my Amazon Klein bottle listing by jhgb on Friday July 02, 2021 @02:13AM (#27708310)
Which makes no sense, since CDA's Section 230 is saying nothing about being an accomplice to crimes, only about not being treated as the publisher or speaker of some information.
Re:A foreign seller has hijacked my Amazon Klein bottle listing by heavyset_go on Friday July 02, 2021 @02:21PM (#27714922)
I agree, and there's a case that's gone to the Supreme Court over this, so we'll see how they rule.