Note that I wouldn’t pass the listed minimum requirements

Re:Note that I wouldn’t pass the listed minimum requirements by jamiek88 on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @09:50AM (#27688496)

It’s not about lowering the standard it’s about clearly communicating them.

Why do we need this doublespeak and a wink and a nod for these roles?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Note that I wouldn’t pass the listed minimum requirements by matt-attack on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @10:52AM (#27689258)

And why are women and minorities unaware of the wink and a nod? What else are they not aware of?

Are they not able to reason through the fact that the requirements must logically be not realistic? Are women known to not question authority to the same degree as men? Why not endeavor to fix that about women.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Note that I wouldn’t pass the listed minimum requirements by watwut on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @11:06AM (#27689441)

It is about who assumes rules will be bend for them. If you apply for role where you dont fit requirements, it can be interpreted as ambitions or arrogant or stupid.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Note that I wouldn’t pass the listed minimum requirements by evandale on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @11:24AM (#27689663)

I don't understand why being seen as arrogant or stupid by a faceless HR robot in a company you don't work for should matter to a person. It feels like a confidence issue that somebody should look into resolving so that they can live a more fulfilling life.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Note that I wouldn’t pass the listed minimum requirements by watwut on Thursday July 01, 2021 @04:56PM (#27704753)

This response is either dumb or manipulative. Likely both.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Note that I wouldn’t pass the listed minimum requirements by matt-attack on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @11:07AM (#27689459)

…or well-read.

[ Parent | on HN ]