News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Conspiracy: In Theory and Practice by shadowgovt on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @07:47AM (#27687365)
The main difference between government surveillance and 9/11 truther conspiracy is that the government surveillance "secret" can be kept in the open because the bulk of the citizenry doesn't care, or actually thinks it's in their best interests for the government to be surveilling everyone.

In contrast, the bulk of the citizenry would be up in arms if there were indisputable proof that our government orchestrated a terrorist attack on American soil that killed thousands of people.

Evidence: the reaction to the Snowden leaks. Lots of Americans responded to that news with "oh okay; that's a rational thing for the NSA to be doing to combat terrorism."

Re:Conspiracy: In Theory and Practice by posix_me_less on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @09:24AM (#27688199)
> the citizenry would be up in arms if there were indisputable proof that our government orchestrated

Not so sure about that. Large portion of population does believe that and they are not up in arms.

Re:Conspiracy: In Theory and Practice by shadowgovt on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @11:20AM (#27689618)
It's not a wide enough margin. The Scrips 2006 poll suggested around 16% think it's "very likely" someone in the US government either assisted or took no action (as frame of reference, Pew Research suggests between 4 and 7% of respondent input is "bogus"... Not just random, but intentionally biased towards the most unlikely answer to troll the pollsters [https://www.pewresearch.org/methods/2020/02/18/assessing-the...]).
Re:Conspiracy: In Theory and Practice by atatatat on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @11:57AM (#27690076)
2006?!?!?!?!?!?!
Re:Conspiracy: In Theory and Practice by shadowgovt on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @05:07PM (#27693422)
That was the generous year. Belief has waned since then.

Statista probed the question in 2019 and found strong belief at 11%. https://www.statista.com/statistics/959504/belief-september-...