Re:Miami building collapse: Letter in April warned of worsen...
by myphs on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @06:41AM
(#27686989)
And some people try to push their agenda and make it about climate change. Absolutely ridiculous!
"Did climate change undermine Champlain Towers South?"
https://www.economist.com/united-states/2021/06/28/did-clima...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Miami building collapse: Letter in April warned of worsen...
by input_sh on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @06:46AM
(#27687028)
I can't tell if you're trying to be sarcastic or not, but if not, you should've definitely picked a better link. That link says "climate change wasn't the only reason", not "climate change has nothing to do with this".
Re:Miami building collapse: Letter in April warned of worsen...
by myphs on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @06:50AM
(#27687047)
I was sarcastic. I guess it's hard to tell.
Re:Miami building collapse: Letter in April warned of worsen...
by andybak on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @06:56AM
(#27687074)
Even now I'm not sure I understand what part you are claiming was sarcasm.
Re:Miami building collapse: Letter in April warned of worsen...
by mromanuk on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @08:24AM
(#27687609)
Only way to use sarcasm online is, making it literal with the help of a closing tag like /sarcasm o </sarcasm> Is like winking your eye after your sarcastic phrase
Re:Miami building collapse: Letter in April warned of worsen...
by wayoutthere on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @08:03AM
(#27687468)
Sarcasm is a lazy rhetorical tool that doesn’t translate well to the internet. IMO it’s best avoided online.