An EPYC escape: Case-study of a KVM breakout

Re:An EPYC escape: Case-study of a KVM breakout by yjftsjthsd-h on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @04:11PM (#27681099)

> There is, instead, a somewhat involved (if somewhat informal) process designed to ensure that each patch is reviewed for quality and that each patch implements a change which is desirable to have in the mainline.

- https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/2.Process.htm...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:An EPYC escape: Case-study of a KVM breakout by jeffbee on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @04:34PM (#27681370)

That's basically the process by which gatekeepers tell newcomers to go away. It doesn't really apply to the vast majority of changes from established contributors. You only have to hang out on l-k for a few minutes to get the flavor of things.

The only patches getting thorough code reviews are getting them from organizations with their own internal code review culture.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:An EPYC escape: Case-study of a KVM breakout by ylyn on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @09:05PM (#27683764)

Do you have evidence for your claims?

[ Parent | on HN ]