Re:Bring back menus, QR codes are terrible
by bloak on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @06:00AM
(#27673847)
On the other hand, pathogens survive longer on a smooth surface than on a rough absorbant surface, and I would guess that they are more likely to be transferred from a smooth surface onto somebody's hand than from a rough absorvant surface. So, taking account of people perhaps not doing all that spraying and wiping properly, a paper menu might turn out to be safer after all.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bring back menus, QR codes are terrible
by mosselman on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @07:42AM
(#27674466)
I could be wrong, as I often am, but I think getting covid from a surface is recently proven to be highly unlikely.
Re:Bring back menus, QR codes are terrible
by Symmetry on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @09:30AM
(#27675510)
In March of 2020 we were pretty sure that at most 5% of Covid transmissions were through touched surfaces (fomites). Currently we're sure that at most .01% of Covid transmissions are through surfaces and still haven't found clear evidence of it ever actually having happened so literally 0% still can't be ruled out. But upper respiratory tract infections like the flu do actually spread through fomites pretty easily so we've defaulted to the flu playbook for many public health measures.
Re:Bring back menus, QR codes are terrible
by stjohnswarts on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @12:25PM
(#27678137)
There are a lot of diseases out there that are transferred on surfaces however. Not everything is about covid
Re:Bring back menus, QR codes are terrible
by cinntaile on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @07:50AM
(#27674543)
They have known this since april 2020, it was a German scientist that first tested this I believe.
Then destroy and replace them with every service?
it's only a printed sheet
Re:Bring back menus, QR codes are terrible
by stjohnswarts on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @12:25PM
(#27678144)
Interestingly this is why wood cutting boards are better than plastic ones.