Re:Mexico's Supreme Court has decriminalised the private use...
by foxes on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @01:20AM
(#27672098)
Again, the argument that because bad x exists and is allowed freely does not mean y should be allowed. You can not use transitive arguments for this. I would think that pain killer should also be restricted. Anecdotal small sample sizes are also not convincing either way, I do not think we should be so cavalier with allowing or disallowing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mexico's Supreme Court has decriminalised the private use...
by rantwasp on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @02:10AM
(#27672423)
my point is that everything should be allowed and the decision should be at a personal level. that’s freedom! literally the definition of freedom. you can do whatever you want as long as you don’t restrict others freedom
Re:Mexico's Supreme Court has decriminalised the private use...
by foxes on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @02:26AM
(#27672523)
I respectfully disagree, society does not function like that. We need constraints. It might not restrict others freedoms entirely, but there are still consequences for actions, things do not happen in a vacuum.
Re:Mexico's Supreme Court has decriminalised the private use...
by enchiridion on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @01:16PM
(#27678847)
Things indeed do not happen in a vacuum. Each situation is heavily influenced by the complicated and nuanced circumstances surrounding it.
Do you think a few hundred people in the central government should decide how to handle those situations, or the people most intimately familiar with the details?