News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might be worse. Parent comment

Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by wyager on Monday June 28, 2021 @05:26PM (#27668383)
Your model is nonsense - physical goods are not the same as digital goods.

Regardless of whether or not your model actually makes sense, an inevitable consequence of your model is that the internet will become siloed at a national level. It sounds like you’re fine with that though.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by scott_w on Monday June 28, 2021 @11:59PM (#27671608)
They’re not the same but they don’t need to be. It’s not my model, it’s just the way the world has always worked.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by wyager on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @08:57AM (#27675146)
Show me a company that ever got sued, indicted, or fined by a foreign country for sending internet packets to that country, with no other business presence in the country, before 2010.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by scott_w on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @10:30AM (#27676270)
Not a company but USA vs Gary McKinnon 2002.
[ Parent | on HN ]