Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might be worse

Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by topicseed on Monday June 28, 2021 @12:13PM (#27663748)

Well, I do appreciate my ad revenue to pay my team members and myself so I won't be the one recommending that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by kuschku on Monday June 28, 2021 @04:00PM (#27667093)

Of course, harming people always pays well, doesn't make it something you should be proud of.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by my_usernam3 on Monday June 28, 2021 @04:20PM (#27667457)

I read the comment in a different light. He or she is not exactly proud just admitting to the current circumstance. Specifically with this phrase

> so I won't be the one recommending that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by netr0ute on Monday June 28, 2021 @04:34PM (#27667683)

Hot Take: If your website needs ads to survive, it wasn't that good to begin with.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by topicseed on Monday June 28, 2021 @05:54PM (#27668705)

Cold Take: I never mentioned survival, so take this word back to your imagination.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by Google234 on Monday June 28, 2021 @05:01PM (#27668059)

Let me guess, you also install paywall bypass extensions?

[ Parent | on HN ]