Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ...
by fuzzy2 on Monday June 28, 2021 @11:44AM
(#27663363)
Hm? I think Parent is just hoping Google is required by law not to rank results this way. It would not bar access to anything.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ...
by nicce on Monday June 28, 2021 @12:05PM
(#27663645)
I guess the difference comes, when law requirement happens on EU only, not globally. So the question is, which is worse; not regulate at all or regulated only in one area. It bars access from some point of view, it might not exist if you don't see it from search results.
Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ...
by buran77 on Monday June 28, 2021 @12:21PM
(#27663860)
There's no question. What you're suggesting is "I shot one leg, might as well shoot the other". There's no reason why it would be better if everyone suffers the same fate rather than about half a billion people having it better. Having to provide a better service for so many users just puts pressure on a company by showing every other user not benefiting yet that it's possible, that they can ask and expect more.