Re:Key witness in Assange case admits to lies in indictment
by the_optimist on Monday June 28, 2021 @02:54PM
(#27666103)
WL batch processed sources. You get the boring ones with the salacious ones, possibly useful for context. I listed three assumptions and you denied one. Since you want more disclosure that goes against the judgment of the site owners, why not just start your own site?
Once again, I am not assuming or presuming anything. I am judging the documents directly. Have you looked at them? Because it doesn't get any more mundane and uninteresting than people taking office lunch orders[1], people reporting they are at the dentist, or even over a hundred automatic out of office replies[3]. If these emails are worthy of publishing, everything is worthy of publishing.
If anything, these emails have negative public value because they drown out the leaked emails that might have actually interesting content and many of them, especially the out of office emails, end up leaking totally innocent people's contact information.
[1] - https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/21638
[2] - https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/23479
[3] - https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q=&title=automatic+reply&c...