San Francisco residents are fed up with city inaction on open-air drug use

Re:San Francisco residents are fed up with city inaction on ... by adamrezich on Monday June 28, 2021 @10:34AM (#27662514)

what kind of writer? is the statement untrue? I don't know as I don't live there. I'm just curious as to what this vague statement means

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:San Francisco residents are fed up with city inaction on ... by callmeal on Monday June 28, 2021 @10:40AM (#27662593)

I see two things wrong with that statement: 1: the obvious attempt whip up racism/xenophobia, and 2:

Score means 20. Scores to me mean at least 40 (more than one score). Is the writer implying that there are at least 40 drug dealers in a tiny dead-end street [0]?

[0]: https://goo.gl/maps/4NbqnwHibWyM9KLDA

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:San Francisco residents are fed up with city inaction on ... by readflaggedcomm on Monday June 28, 2021 @11:34AM (#27663230)

In the article linked by this one about the sanctuary policy, The DA defends not prosecuting drug crimes by claiming it's a way to deport offenders. It seems he and he author are of a similar mind on who police are arresting.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:San Francisco residents are fed up with city inaction on ... by josephcsible on Monday June 28, 2021 @10:45AM (#27662659)

As I've said elsewhere, why do you think that statement was talking about just that street? It's totally reasonable to think there's at least 40 drug dealers in the whole Tenderloin.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:San Francisco residents are fed up with city inaction on ... by callmeal on Monday June 28, 2021 @11:46AM (#27663389)

>It's totally reasonable to think there's at least 40 drug dealers in the whole Tenderloin.

And that they're all from Mexico/Central America right?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:San Francisco residents are fed up with city inaction on ... by adamrezich on Monday June 28, 2021 @10:43AM (#27662630)

what makes you assume this specific intent?

[ Parent | on HN ]