True. But the statistical apple only falls so far from the statistical tree.

You gonna put trust the future of your community to the kid of some "activists" or are you gonna trust the future of the community to someone raised in a household where the parents were a little more professional?

Furthermore, the apple in question has spoken at length about their beliefs and seems to have only learned that you can't bomb your way into making people agree with you. It's one thing to judge someone by their parents when you have no indicators or when you have indicators that they're different from their parents. It's a much safer bet when you have evidence confirming they are the same.

I'm all for giving people the benefit of the doubt but that's impossible to do for Chesa Boudin since there is no doubt.

> the statistical apple only falls so far from the statistical tree

Lots of good people come from bad places. And lots of people coming from good places take that goodness for granted.

Please show me the statistical data and sources to back up your claim(s).

I hope the people who have so much sympathy for Venezuelans fleeing the country are willing to open their own country's doors to them.

Somehow, though, I suspect those very same people will instead give them the middle finger and build a wall to keep them out, because they really don't give a shit about Venezuelans but just want to score political points by being against a left-wing government.

It's not sustainable to take in unlimited numbers of immigrants from every badly-governed country in the world. It'd be way better to fix Venezuela's government so people don't need to flee anymore.

Who's talking about unlimited?

Let's start with allowing in more immigrants than we do now.

But, no, instead the racists and xenophobes (because that's what they are) are always pushing for less.

Hate speech and name-calling aimed at anyone who supports a strong border shows how weak the argument for open borders really is.