News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Challenges in the diagnosis of magnesium status. Parent comment

Re:Challenges in the diagnosis of magnesium status by klyrs on Sunday June 27, 2021 @05:50PM (#27655783)
> Two doctors have now ate nothing but meat, animal fat and organs for two years and posted their test results

I see your n=2 "study" and raise the risk of colorectal cancer; an n=900 study with plausible causative link.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27655186

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Challenges in the diagnosis of magnesium status by seaorg on Sunday June 27, 2021 @06:06PM (#27655923)
Your proof that I’m wrong is some garbage epidemiology study about colon cancer?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Challenges in the diagnosis of magnesium status by klyrs on Sunday June 27, 2021 @06:48PM (#27656194)
No, I did not prove you wrong. I highlighted a risk that's implicated for the diet you're hawking. Maybe you'd enjoy living with a colostomy bag; no judgements here.

What about that study makes you say that it's "garbage?"

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Challenges in the diagnosis of magnesium status by celticninja on Sunday June 27, 2021 @06:18PM (#27656008)
It's garbage when you disagree with it and solid science when 2 people who claim to be doctors post something on a web forum?
[ Parent | on HN ]