Re:CRISPR gene-editing breakthrough opens door to treating b...
by alex_sf on Sunday June 27, 2021 @02:06AM
(#27649015)
All crops are GMO. The only difference is how fast they were modified.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:CRISPR gene-editing breakthrough opens door to treating b...
by null_object on Sunday June 27, 2021 @03:53AM
(#27649523)
> All crops are GMO. The only difference is how fast they were modified.
This is often said in defense of GMO, but surely cross-breeding and hybridization - a farmer or gardener attempting to combine the entire genetic entity of one plant with another one (which must therefore be naturally compatible), to increase the potential utility of the result - is totally different to inserting a single gene from a totally arbitrary source (which can therefore be a completely separate life-form)?
Re:CRISPR gene-editing breakthrough opens door to treating b...
by pas on Monday June 28, 2021 @02:15AM
(#27658665)
With enough time that trait would show up by simple selective breeding too. GMO does it faster. (Of course so much faster that there is an argument that it's qualitatively not the same as good old breeding. And if someone comes up with some kind of killer trees that release anthrax in the spring that too counts as GMO too, but they are unlikely to be deterred by labeling requirements or GMO bans.)
Re:CRISPR gene-editing breakthrough opens door to treating b...
by drran on Sunday June 27, 2021 @02:05PM
(#27653720)
If I make a sandwich (wheat genes + chicken genes + cow genes + yeast genes) and cover it with honey (insect genes), what will happen to me when I will eat it?
Re:CRISPR gene-editing breakthrough opens door to treating b...
by _0ffh on Sunday June 27, 2021 @10:13AM
(#27651713)
And then there's Atomic Gardening which has been done for ages and does not officially count as producing GMOs, IIRC.
Re:CRISPR gene-editing breakthrough opens door to treating b...
by karottenreibe on Sunday June 27, 2021 @02:13AM
(#27649048)
Are you saying that's not a significant difference? It seems to me.
Re:CRISPR gene-editing breakthrough opens door to treating b...
by alex_sf on Sunday June 27, 2021 @02:35AM
(#27649168)
Not really any more alarming to me than the initial domestication I guess. Manipulating the world around us is kinda our whole deal as a species.
Re:CRISPR gene-editing breakthrough opens door to treating b...
by laburn on Sunday June 27, 2021 @02:25AM
(#27649116)
It seems to you what?
Re:CRISPR gene-editing breakthrough opens door to treating b...
by hoseja on Sunday June 27, 2021 @02:45AM
(#27649209)
Probably that letting the slow-GMO survive in a natural environment for hundreds of years does wonders for ironing out the really bad bugs.
I'm not anti-GMO but i've been more wary ever since I realized it will inevitably be used to make better citizens (and not by making them better humans).
Re:CRISPR gene-editing breakthrough opens door to treating b...
by petre on Sunday June 27, 2021 @03:01AM
(#27649273)
It depends. There's a number of dog breeds with known genetical issues.
GE is a double edged sword just like nuclear energy. With great power comes great responsability.
Re:CRISPR gene-editing breakthrough opens door to treating b...
by hoseja on Sunday June 27, 2021 @03:40AM
(#27649473)
Those are mostly innovations of the latest century or so, bred "scientifically", regulated by dog breed foundations and chasing dog-show metrics.
Re:CRISPR gene-editing breakthrough opens door to treating b...
by rorykoehler on Sunday June 27, 2021 @06:45AM
(#27650417)
This is false. The distance between selective breeding and GMO is horizontal vs vertical gene transfer.