Sorry, we replaced that old technology, “see-through glass”

Re:Sorry, we replaced that old technology, “see-through glass” by xmprt on Friday June 25, 2021 @10:08PM (#27638418)

I remember a company patented an invention where people would have to shout <brand name> at the TV to get the advertisement to stop.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sorry, we replaced that old technology, “see-through glass” by TheSpiceIsLife on Friday June 25, 2021 @10:30PM (#27638529)

Would it allow or reject “FUCK COKE!”.

Probably force-repeat the ad.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sorry, we replaced that old technology, “see-through glass” by baliex on Saturday June 26, 2021 @03:05AM (#27639808)

I’m not a human psychology expert by any means but I’m afraid think this would probably still work in their favour.

“There’s no such thing as bad publicity” is a thing because just having your brand name out there (even if it’s bad news) is better than it not being out there at all.

Fuck advertising and the greedy profit-driven place it comes from.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sorry, we replaced that old technology, “see-through glass” by truenamenofame on Saturday June 26, 2021 @02:04AM (#27639550)

It offers a Pepsi instead.

[ Parent | on HN ]