Re:Disproportionate amount of bad online behaviour stems fro...
by falldmg on Friday June 25, 2021 @04:37PM
(#27635951)
Unfortunately, your critique has even less substantiation than the article, and therefore it would be even sillier to draw conclusions from it...
Re:Disproportionate amount of bad online behaviour stems fro...
by nickysielicki on Friday June 25, 2021 @04:59PM
(#27636196)
That's only really a fair criticism if I had written an entire article about why this article is bad. Of course a comment about an article will have less substance than an article, that doesn't excuse this article from failing to meet the higher bar that ought to exist for an article.
Re:Disproportionate amount of bad online behaviour stems fro...
by falldmg on Friday June 25, 2021 @05:22PM
(#27636432)
No, I disagree. Your critique is shallow even for it's relative prominence. The article literally opens with a counterpoint that you shouldn't generally use this as an excuse. What you said in your comment acts almost as perfect critique for itself: it sounds right, but it has zero substance. Why should anyone value a critique that says almost zero actual things about the article and instead draws a general conclusion that sounds like it came from purely reading the headline?
Re:Disproportionate amount of bad online behaviour stems fro...
by slingnow on Friday June 25, 2021 @06:09PM
(#27636864)
Having the article state that you "shouldn't use it as an excuse" is probably about as effective as the surgeon generals warning on the side of a pack of cigarettes.
What makes you believe that quick disclaimer would discredit the claim the OP is making?
Re:Disproportionate amount of bad online behaviour stems fro...
by falldmg on Friday June 25, 2021 @07:05PM
(#27637332)
This is an invalid critique of the article. It is critiquing it for something it doesn't do, now justified by the idea that people might ignore what it actually says.
Re:Disproportionate amount of bad online behaviour stems fro...
by okareaman on Friday June 25, 2021 @04:14PM
(#27635696)
You don't say what is wishy washy or give any supporting evidence to your assertion that HN users seemingly fall for such arguments or how "nice sounding" arguments embed themselves into our thought patterns to control us or how these wishy washy nice sounding arguments lead us to dismiss people. You sound like you may have psychological issues and I say this as a non-neurotypical (bipolar)
Re:Disproportionate amount of bad online behaviour stems fro...
by nickthemagicman on Friday June 25, 2021 @04:24PM
(#27635823)
That's a little ad hominem to diagnose them from one paragraph.
There's actually a well known term for what they're describing.
It's called pop science and is a very real thing.
Re:Disproportionate amount of bad online behaviour stems fro...
by nickysielicki on Friday June 25, 2021 @04:45PM
(#27636037)
I'm pretty sure they're joking.
The plural of anecdote is not evidence.