Re:I was let go for refusing to deploy a dark pattern
by ehnto on Friday June 25, 2021 @03:40PM
(#27635338)
I am in agreeance by the way. I think perhaps my comment came across as trying to soften the seriousness of dark-patterns when really I was just trying to say that there are lots of different perspectives on different types of coercion. It's not that it's unclear when something is coercive, it's that it's unclear how much coercion and trickery is unethical, as it depends on who you ask.
Re:I was let go for refusing to deploy a dark pattern
by matheusmoreira on Friday June 25, 2021 @03:56PM
(#27635484)
> it's that it's unclear how much coercion and trickery is unethical
Any amount of coercion and trickery is unethical. This is absolutely clear to me.
At what point does it not? Pop-ups exist to steal attention. It's abuse. Why do these marketers believe they are entitled to anyone's attention? They are not.
> a business owner can have a very hard time grasping why
Of course. Businesses generally couldn't care less about how much they're abusing their workers or their consumers. The only thing they care about is their profit. Dark patterns are just value extraction mechanisms, it's their abusiveness that makes them dark.
> they can often act like they're simply herding sheep. Users are ephemeral zombies to some, and from that lens, it's totally fine to capture them with sneaky tactics
Yes. It's an inherently abusive and sociopathic view. They don't consider us human beings.