The Conclusion: A 6 Figure Business That Fell Apart When I Was 16

Re:The Conclusion: A 6 Figure Business That Fell Apart When ... by somecoolguy on Thursday July 14, 2011 @10:43AM (#2763249)

Dude, it technically is illegal to sell replica mp3 players. So the company had every right to shut him down. He's lucky he didn't get sued anyway.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Conclusion: A 6 Figure Business That Fell Apart When ... by scythe on Thursday July 14, 2011 @11:04AM (#2763319)

You could be right, 'cuz I don't know the legality of "selling an mp3 player that looks like that mp3 player some other guy sells" and certainly not in Australia. However, I mean the use of the legal system as intimidation instead of arbitration, which is what happened here.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Conclusion: A 6 Figure Business That Fell Apart When ... by jacques_chester on Thursday July 14, 2011 @11:29AM (#2763461)

You can be sued if your product looks too much like another product that has, in part, been trademarked or otherwise protected. You can also be sued for "passing off" under some trade practices laws.

If you look at the pictures, they look very similar indeed to the Major Manufacturer's product. In their position I'd do the same thing.

IANAL, TINLA, and in particular I never got around to studying this area of law.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Conclusion: A 6 Figure Business That Fell Apart When ... by ma2rten on Thursday July 14, 2011 @11:40AM (#2763510)

IANAL, TINLA either, but I don't think you can trademark product design. If anything copyright law is applicable.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Conclusion: A 6 Figure Business That Fell Apart When ... by rtrunck on Thursday July 14, 2011 @05:25PM (#2765199)

You can get a trademark on a product as trade dress

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Conclusion: A 6 Figure Business That Fell Apart When ... by mckoss on Thursday July 14, 2011 @12:05PM (#2763613)

You have to have a design patent to protect the "shape" of a product. They look a little like iPod nanos, but can Apple really protect ANY small rectangular metal music player?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Conclusion: A 6 Figure Business That Fell Apart When ... by nl on Thursday July 14, 2011 @12:39PM (#2763779)

If it could reasonably be mistaken for an iPod nano, then yes, a design patent covers it.

(I can't see the image of his player because it won't load for me)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Conclusion: A 6 Figure Business That Fell Apart When ... by masklinn on Thursday July 14, 2011 @04:37PM (#2764977)

> If it could reasonably be mistaken for an iPod nano

It looks like a shuffle, with buttons replacing the wheel (nano would need a screen and be far more expensive)

> (I can't see the image of his player because it won't load for me)

http://imgur.com/s2v8A

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Conclusion: A 6 Figure Business That Fell Apart When ... by sliverstorm on Thursday July 14, 2011 @01:45PM (#2764074)

I would expect Apple, more than any other tech company, to hold a plethora of design patents.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Conclusion: A 6 Figure Business That Fell Apart When ... by nl on Thursday July 14, 2011 @12:37PM (#2763770)

I mean the use of the legal system as intimidation instead of arbitration

They gave him a chance to stop before he had to spend any money on court. That's a good thing, not bad!

[ Parent | on HN ]