Re:Why Go Is Not Good
by mseepgood on Friday June 25, 2021 @07:16AM
(#27629303)
> Generic Programming
The author does not seem to be aware that generics are coming in Go 1.18.
> Language Extensibility
Go was carefully designed to disallow this kind of extensibility. The point is that operators and other language constructs like `for ... range` always can be trusted and have a known cost. The author basically lists a pro as a con.
The author does not seem to be aware that generics are coming in Go 1.18.
> Language Extensibility
Go was carefully designed to disallow this kind of extensibility. The point is that operators and other language constructs like `for ... range` always can be trusted and have a known cost. The author basically lists a pro as a con.